Vasudha
Chembur West, 400071
- Litigation pending (7). MahaRERA's litigation disclosure lists 7 pending cases against this project.
- Agreement deviates from RERA model form. The promoter's allotment letter or agreement for sale is flagged as deviating from MahaRERA's standard proforma — read the actual clauses before signing.
Central crossroads reborn via freeway and Metro links.
- Growth drivers:
- Eastern Freeway, Monorail/Metro, BKC proximity at half the price.
- Who buys here:
- BKC-bound professionals and long-time Chembur families.
PropPin area guide — editorial, not a RERA disclosure.
Official RERA facts
- Registration
- PR1180002600485
- Status
- New
- Stage
- Certificate Signed
- Possession
- December 2028
- Construction
- —
- Units sold
- 0 of 0
RERA complaint record0 records
No complaints disclosed on MahaRERA (checked 24 Jul 2026).
Litigation record7 cases
- Bombay High CourtCase WP/705/2025The petitioner has prayed that the Hon’ble court should quash and set aside the Respondent No.1 Order dated 21/10/2024 accepting/ declaring the nomination of Respondent No.2 as valid nomination and also to decide and uphold petition objection of declaring respondent No.2 as ineligible candidate for Respondent No.3 society election being a defaulter. And has also prayed that the Hon’ble court provide direction to the Respondent No.1 to disqualify the nomination of Respondent No.2 and pending the hearing and Writ petition the effect and implementation of the allotment of symbols and other further acts by the Election officer Respondent No.1 be made subject to the disposal of this petition with a noting to that effect against the name of the respondent No.2 name in nomination list. The petitioner has also prayed that the court direct the SCEA for appropriate actions against respondent No.1 election officer bending/ violating MCS act laws on defaulter and their disqualificationsStatus: Ongoing
- Supreme CourtCase IA/3868/2024The Relevent Obligor represents and Warrents that the case arose due to the petition filed by Mrs.Damyanti Pujari Seeking to halt society election proceedingsStatus: Ongoing
- Bombay High CourtCase IA/3867/2024The above Interim Application is filed by the Org. Writ petitioner in the WP (ST) 33560 of 2024 (i.e WP/705/2025) to bring to notice of the High Court of the alleged fraud on 22nd November 2024 resulting in impugned order dated 22-11-2024 for being an act of fraud by Respondent No.2 Sunil Das through and by Advocate Anil K. Patil and not making truthful disclosure that Developers termination matter is already sub judice matter of Contempt Ptn. (St.) 311568 of 2024 as recorded in order dated 21-10-2024. Such an act of wilful concealment is a fraudulent suppression and this a fraud upon the court. The Applicant/ Org. Writ petitioner has prayed that Hon’ble court be pleased to declare order dated 22nd November 2024 as act of fraud and set it aside and other orders deemed fit in view of facts and circumstances of the case be passed. The Hon’ble Court Justice Jamdar has by Order dt. 22/11/2024 has observed in para no. 6 that said Mrs. Pujara is not allowing the Court to pass order and afterStatus: Ongoing
- Bombay High CourtCase CPST/20729/2023The Contempt Petitioner has prayed that the Hon’ble court be pleased to issue Show Cause Notice for Contempt to the Contemnors for wilful violation of status quo order dated 22/12/2023 in IA (st) 34243 of 2023, and to initiate Contempt proceedings against the Contemnors for their Civil Contempt acts of violating status quo order dated 22/12/2023 and also suo-moto Contempt / Appropriate sections for fraudulent affidavit reply dated 16th December 2024 to notice issued vide order dated 22/12/2023 in Contempt petition 4770 of 2024 (in IA (st) 34243 of 2023) and to punish the Contemnors with appropriate punishment in accordance with law and Contempt of Courts Act, The Contempt Petition is pending before Hon’ble Bombay High Court filed by the Society against Pujaras.Status: Ongoing
- City Civil Court MumbaiCase 100927/2019The defendant Nos. 1 to 3 have also filed an Application below Exhibit 16 and 17 for dismissal of the suit. Honourable Judge Shri. S.D. Kulkarni stated in his order dated 12th January 2022 that “the alleged building is dilapidated in condition, therefore all parties are agreed for its redevelopment. So prayer in this suit regarding redevelopment is missing in a Writ Petition therefore, the suit can be proceeded or can be decided on merit. There are two different proceedings, and suit cannot be dismissed u/s.151 of the Civil Procedure Code therefore, in my opinion applications are not tenable. Suit of the plaintiff cannot dismiss because of the pendency of Writ Petition in between the same parties.” Hence the Hon’ble Court was pleased to reject the application vide their order dated 12th January 2022.Status: Ongoing
- Bombay High CourtCase CAF/2804/2016The above Civil Application is filed by the Appellant in the First Appeal No. 813 of 2012 before the Hon’ble High Court against the Respondent No.3 for furnishing/ obtaining the records and all information and documents since redevelopment and relevant records have not been furnished by the Respondent society inspite of various efforts and Respondent Corporation cannot be trusted due to various wrong records created, records tampered and contradictory statements made in various letters/ resolutions also clarifications of the wrong plans got approved from the Respondent Corporation. The Appellants have prayed that the Hon’ble Court direct the Org. Respondent No.3 (Vasudha Society) to furnish the records and all information and documents as per the list enclosed to the Appellants letter dated 5/3/2016 (Exhibit C) within a period of 4 weeks. And also to furnish the records and all information and documents as listed in Exhibit “D”Status: Ongoing
- Bombay High CourtCase FA/813/2012The Trial court passed an Order on the said Exhibit “14” on 3rd April 2012 and dismissed the suit of the Original Plaintiff i.e. the Appellants hereinabove. The Appellant has filed the above First Appeal on the grounds that the Order dated 3rd April 2012 passed by the Trial court is against the provisions of law and C.P.C and facts on record. That the order of the Ld. Trial Judge totally ignores the fact that the Respondent No.1 and 2 had never filed any Written Statement and/ or any reply to any of the interim applications also Respondent Nos 1 and 2 are restrained from passing any orders on file of society by Injunction order dated 12/9/2008 and their say on the Issue was not taken at all. That the Ld. Trial Judge could not have come to the conclusion that the suit has become infructuous on the basis of the Resolution and the letters addressed to the Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai.Status: Ongoing
The promoter's allotment letter or agreement for sale is flagged as deviating from MahaRERA's standard proforma — read the actual clauses carefully before signing.
Landowner
Vasudha Co Operative Housing Society Limited
Building & registration
- RERA registered
- May 2026
- Plot / CTS / survey no.
- 1621
- Planning authority
- P-26661/2025/(1621)/M/W Ward/CHEMBUR-W/337/1/New
- Approved layout land
- 645.5 sq.m
- Land for this registration
- 645.5 sq.m
- Recreational open space
- 0 sq.m
- Permissible built-up area
- 606.87 sq.m
- Promoter contact
- harita Developers
- Registered office
- Guruprasad Divine Residency
- North
- By Road
- South
- By CTS No 1623
- East
- By CTS No 1620
- West
- By CTS No -1622
Project bank account
The RERA-designated account this project's payments should go to — verify before wiring any money.
- YES BANK — 167099IFSC YESB0000058GROUND FLOOR,SHRIKANT CHAMBERS,, NXT TO RK STUDIO,SION TROMBAY ROAD,, CHEMBUR, MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA-400071
Commencement Certificate documents
- First CC - Vasudha.pdf
Buyer community
Connect with other buyers and owners of Vasudha — compare quotes, swap site-visit notes and possession updates, and check construction quality before you commit. No brokers, no sales pitch.
No topics yet — start one and connect with the next buyer researching Vasudha. Real notes from real buyers beat any brochure.
Data sourced from the official MahaRERA portal; complaints last synced 24 Jul 2026. PropPin surfaces public disclosures verbatim and is not affiliated with MahaRERA.