All RERA projects

The Promise Ledger — Mumbai

Every brochure quotes one possession date. MahaRERA is the only place that also keeps the date the builder originally filed. This page is the gap between the two — recomputed live from official disclosures for every project we track, so each number is checkable against the registration it came from.

CityAllMumbai 8560Pune 5697Bengaluru 1303StatusAllUnder constructionReady to move
42%
of the 8,557 tracked projects that filed both dates still stand by the possession date they originally committed to.
Market average87 · A
  • 4,946 projects have pushed their possession date by 3 months or more. The typical slip is 0.3 years; the average is 1.5.
  • 53% of the projects still building are already past the date they filed — and another 27% are short of the pace needed to hit it.
  • Those slips add up to 3 L buyer-years of extra waiting across 1.9 L homes that were already sold.
8,560
tracked projects in this ledger
14,267
complaint records across 1,839 projects
73
recovery warrants on 58 projects
41%
of 5.5 L tracked homes sold

Can they still hand over on the date they're selling?

Every under-construction project that discloses both a possession date and a construction percentage, placed by how much time it has left and how much of the build is done. The red line is the pace a site must sustain from here to finish on time — anything below it is being sold on a date its own filing doesn't support.

Already overdue
3,362 · 53%
past the date in their own filing
Short of the pace
1,706 · 27%
too much left to build in the time
Time in hand
1,244 · 20%
enough runway at that pace
0%25%50%75%100%4 yrs late2 yrs latedue date+2 yrs+4 yrs+6 yrsTime to the possession date the builder is quoting today →Construction done

Swipe the plot sideways for the rest of the timeline.

1 project697 per cellPace needed to finish on time (2.5% of the build per month)

The end columns are catch-alls: 1,619 projects more than 5 years overdue sit in the first column, and 12 due more than 7 years out sit in the last.

Where each year's promises actually went

Projects grouped by the possession year their builder first filed — only years that have already arrived — and how much of each cohort has since moved the date.

Moved the dateHeld the original date
  • 201728% moved
  • 201835% moved
  • 201945% moved
  • 202047% moved
  • 202143% moved
  • 202241% moved
  • 202340% moved
  • 202449% moved
  • 202557% moved
  • 202670% moved

When a date moves, how far does it move?

Distribution of the 4,946 slips on record. The longest single slip here is 11.3 years.

  • 3–12 months2,885
  • 1–2 years894
  • 2–3 years338
  • 3–5 years464
  • 5+ years365

Which builders keep the date they filed

Share of each developer's dated projects that never pushed possession, over developers with 5 or more such projects here — a perfect record on two projects isn't a record. A kept date and a low PropPin Score can sit together: the score also carries complaints, warrants, litigation and mortgages, so a builder who hits every deadline can still be answering for everything else.

Best kept-date record

Developers with the highest share of possession dates kept
DeveloperProj.KeptScore
H RISHABRAJ REALTY11100%33 · D
HGP Community Pvt. Ltd.7100%81 · A
KABRA AND ASSOCIATES7100%78 · B
MAN REALTORS AND HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED7100%69 · B
BALI REALTY LLP6100%70 · B
Modispaces Real Estate Pvt Ltd6100%78 · B
ROMELL REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED6100%61 · C
MAYFAIR HOUSING6100%73 · B
D. D. ASSOCIATES5100%52 · C
S K DEVELOPERS5100%71 · B

Most moved dates

Developers with the lowest share of possession dates kept
DeveloperProj.KeptScore
Rare Townships Private Limited160%50 · C
MADHU HARSHAD DOSHI70%17 · D
SPENTA ENCLAVE PRIVATE LIMITED60%23 · D
SIDHIVINAYAK CONSTRUCTIONS60%85 · A
JE AND VEE INFRASTRUCTURE60%73 · B
SIDDHI REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS50%43 · D
Jaykali Developers Private Limited50%37 · D
SURAJ ESTATE DEVELOPERS LTD1010%49 · D
ELEVATED AVENUE REALTY LLP813%87 · A
NEPTUNE VENTURES AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED714%45 · D

Selling a date the build pace can't reach

Possession promised within two years, with more construction left than that time can cover at 2.5% a month. Projects reporting 0% are left out — on MahaRERA that is indistinguishable from “not disclosed”. These are the hardest questions to ask before booking.

The longest single slips on record

Originally filed date → the date the same registration quotes today.

What buyers did about it

Complaints, misc. applications and recovery warrants disclosed per project. 6,721 projects here have a clean record; 1,590 disclose pending litigation and 786 are mortgaged to a lender.

Show me the builders who deliver →Buyer-beware list
How these numbers are made

Source. Official MahaRERA portal disclosures for every project we track, recomputed 31 Oct 2026. Nothing here is our estimate of a project — it is the promoter's own filing, re-read.

"Moved the date". The currently proposed completion date is 3 calendar months or more after the original completion date in the same registration. A shorter gap is filing noise, not a broken promise. Slips are measured in calendar months, so a date pushed by exactly two years reads as exactly two years.

The pace line. The feasibility frontier assumes a site can sustain 2.5% of its total build per month — roughly foundation to finish in 40 months. A project below the line isn't doomed; it is claiming a pace faster than a tower typically holds, and that is worth asking about.

Buyer-years. Each delayed project's slip in years multiplied by the homes it had already sold, summed. It measures waiting created, not compensation owed.

Complaints. Disclosed records, not adjudicated outcomes. A complaint is a buyer filing, not a finding of fault. Recovery warrants are MahaRERA's strongest enforcement action and are counted separately.

Developers. Promoter names are grouped by a fuzzy canonical key (stripping "Pvt Ltd", "Developers", "Realty" and the like), so the same builder filing under slightly different names lands in one row.