The Promise Ledger — Pune
Every brochure quotes one possession date. MahaRERA is the only place that also keeps the date the builder originally filed. This page is the gap between the two — recomputed live from official disclosures for every project we track, so each number is checkable against the registration it came from.
- 137 projects have pushed their possession date by 3 months or more. The typical slip is 1.4 years; the average is 1.8.
- Those slips add up to 8,019 buyer-years of extra waiting across 4,965 homes that were already sold.
Where each year's promises actually went
Projects grouped by the possession year their builder first filed — only years that have already arrived — and how much of each cohort has since moved the date.
- 201724% moved · avg +2.6 yrs
- 201838% moved · avg +1.5 yrs
- 201936% moved · avg +2.6 yrs
- 202033% moved · avg +1.8 yrs
- 202128% moved · avg +2.4 yrs
- 202214% moved · avg +2.5 yrs
- 202312% moved · avg +1.8 yrs
- 202424% moved · avg +1.9 yrs
- 202526% moved · avg +1 yrs
- 202613% moved · avg +0.6 yrs
When a date moves, how far does it move?
Distribution of the 137 slips on record. The longest single slip here is 9.6 years.
- 3–12 months34
- 1–2 years64
- 2–3 years17
- 3–5 years16
- 5+ years6
Which builders keep the date they filed
Share of each developer's dated projects that never pushed possession, over developers with 5 or more such projects here — a perfect record on two projects isn't a record. A kept date and a low PropPin Score can sit together: the score also carries complaints, warrants, litigation and mortgages, so a builder who hits every deadline can still be answering for everything else.
Best kept-date record
| Developer | Proj. | Kept | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAJESTIQUE HOMES LLP | 11 | 100% | 81 · A |
| Pegasus Properties Pvt. Ltd. | 5 | 100% | 91 · A+ |
| M/s. Samarth Builders | 5 | 100% | 100 · A+ |
| City Corporation Limited | 9 | 89% | 82 · A |
| PANDIT JAVDEKAR ASSOCIATES | 7 | 86% | 100 · A+ |
The longest single slips on record
Originally filed date → the date the same registration quotes today.
- Astral Residency2019 → 2028 +9.6 yrs
- NISHIGANDH 12019 → 2026 +7.8 yrs
- INDRAPRASTHA2019 → 2027 +7.5 yrs
- SAI BAN2017 → 2025 +7.3 yrs
- NANAI HIGHTS2021 → 2027 +6 yrs
- LAGOM HOMES2024 → 2029 +5.5 yrs
- LAKE TOWER2021 → 2026 +4.8 yrs
- Aseemvishwa2019 → 2024 +4.6 yrs
- AMBIENCE GREENDALE WING D2019 → 2023 +4.5 yrs
- SAKAR APARTMENTS2018 → 2023 +4.4 yrs
What buyers did about it
Complaints, misc. applications and recovery warrants disclosed per project. 421 projects here have a clean record; 107 disclose pending litigation and 8 are mortgaged to a lender.
- Purva Silversand128 records⚠ 1 warrant
- Bonheur A wing45 records
- VTP Aethereus- Phase131 records
- Godrej Greens26 records
- GANGA ISHANYA AB23 records
- VTP Leonara Building B21 records
- Forest Trails Athashri - B216 records
- F Residences13 records
- COURTYARD ONE C BLDG12 records
- Pebbles-HighMont Phase-110 records
How these numbers are made
Source. Official MahaRERA portal disclosures for every project we track, recomputed 15 Sep 2026. Nothing here is our estimate of a project — it is the promoter's own filing, re-read.
"Moved the date". The currently proposed completion date is 3 calendar months or more after the original completion date in the same registration. A shorter gap is filing noise, not a broken promise. Slips are measured in calendar months, so a date pushed by exactly two years reads as exactly two years.
The pace line. The feasibility frontier assumes a site can sustain 2.5% of its total build per month — roughly foundation to finish in 40 months. A project below the line isn't doomed; it is claiming a pace faster than a tower typically holds, and that is worth asking about.
Buyer-years. Each delayed project's slip in years multiplied by the homes it had already sold, summed. It measures waiting created, not compensation owed.
Complaints. Disclosed records, not adjudicated outcomes. A complaint is a buyer filing, not a finding of fault. Recovery warrants are MahaRERA's strongest enforcement action and are counted separately.
Developers. Promoter names are grouped by a fuzzy canonical key (stripping "Pvt Ltd", "Developers", "Realty" and the like), so the same builder filing under slightly different names lands in one row.